On page ten of Octavirate Presents: Lethal Lexicon Volume 1 there is an illustration that, I think, nicely summarizes this product. The picture depicts a cartoonish adventurer attacking what appears to be a beholder. Honey drips from the beholder-like creature's mouth while a swarm of angry bees zero in on the unlucky adventurer's nose. I can imagine this scene playing out at the gaming table. The cruel GM smiles as the PC buries his pole-arm in the "beholder." With a sickening feeling, the player realizes that the monster he's attacking isn't a monster at all, but a very elaborate beehive shaped like one of D&D's most famous monsters. As the poor hero is stung again and again, the GM lets slip the creature's name. It is, in fact, a bee-holder.
The player groans, but it is a groan of death.
There is something of a tradition, especially among the old-guard designers who pioneered the early RPG games, of not always taking the game too seriously. What better way to keep things light than with the occasional goofy (but deadly) monster? The great thing about this collection is that, despite the inherent silliness in these monsters, the whole thing is really clever.
Take, for example, the bear-owl. This monster is comprised of the parts of owl and bear that weren't used by whatever mad-wizard first created the famous owl bear. In other words, its an owl with a bear's head. I'm actually a little frightened by how much sense this makes. Its a bizarro, wahoo kind of sense, but sense nonetheless.
What about the biclops? This hideous giant has TWO eyes! Or the bipolar bear, a two-headed arctic dwelling ursine with two distinct and opposite personalities. How about the militant vegan ape, an obvious homage to the carnivorous ape popular in many 1st Edition adventures? Or the Children of Amon-Kor? These walrus-headed humanoids serve a most obscure and insignificant deity: Amon-Kor, Egyptian god of ice-cold winters.
Another favorite of mine are the Scientifically Inaccurate Dinosaurs. These are dinosaurs inspired by scientific and cultural misconceptions. Ripped from the pages of cheesy B-movies, the dinosaurs are "uniformly aggressive and do not hesitate to engage in battle." Examples include the Brontosaurus, which doesn't technically exist, and the Spiked-Thumb Leaping Iguanodon. The latter, according to my limited knowledge, is based on changing paleontologist opinion on just where the iguanodon's spike-like bones were located; its head or its hands. This version of the monster tosses out all the boring fossil evidence in exchange for a mighty leaping eye gouge attack. Take that, science!
There are, of course, monsters that I didn't care for. The various Endangered Dragons, while a neat idea, are either too mundane (the Cobalt Dragon) or too goofy (the plaid dragon) for my tastes. The Bonacon, a magical cow with a flaming manure attack, sinks too low for me. Evil clowns, on the other hand, are well done, but something I've seen before.
Each creature's stat block contains information for those players using common variant rules such as wounds/vitality, armor as damage reduction, or 3.0 style damage reduction. I'm not sure how many people utilize these alternate rules, but their inclusion was a nice touch.<br><br><b>LIKED</b>: I'm not usually in the market for humorous RPG products, but the Lethal Lexicon Volume 1 is so well done, it really rises above my expectations. When it comes to stupid humor, there is a fine line between clever and dumb. Thankfully, this book stays mostly on the right side of that line. It helps that many of these monsters are deadly enough to be remembered beyond their pun-ridden names and strange attacks.
I'm tempted to take away a few points because this book is so silly. Doing so would be unfair to the spirit of the product, however, so I can't do it. The author sets out a pretty clear mission statement in the opening pages: to capture the kind of don't-take-yourself-too-seriously fun often present in the glory days of D&D. This goal, I believe, is achieved rather handedly.<br><br><b>DISLIKED</b>: I mentioned earlier that I don't care for the cobalt dragon. That isn't entirely true. I actually think the cobalt dragons are really cool. They aren't, however, funny. Nor do they strike me as particularly silly. I guess the joke lies in the fact that cobalt is a bit of a strange mineral on which to base a dragon. Fair enough, but it doesn't jibe well with the rest of the book. Radioactive dragons may be over the top in a ?ten years old in your cousin's basement? kind of way, but they're in an entirely different category than cows with flaming poop attacks or super-intelligent space apes.<br><br><b>QUALITY</b>: Excellent<br><br><b>VALUE</b>: Very Satisfied<br><BR>[THIS REVIEW WAS EDITED]<BR>
|