DriveThruRPG.com
Browse Categories













Back
Other comments left for this publisher:
You must be logged in to rate this
100 Fantasy Landmarks
by Martin T. [Verified Purchaser] Date Added: 06/17/2019 05:42:44

A brilliant collection of ideas. Whilst I have come across a few of them in other fantasy media (books, RPGs and artwork) the majority are unique and inventive. Some of the ideas could act as seeds for GMs to expand on into whole scenarios - which is what I will be doing.

At its price, any GM that creates their own worlds should invest in this.



Rating:
[5 of 5 Stars!]
100 Fantasy Landmarks
Click to show product description

Add to DriveThruRPG.com Order

Pulpfinder: Fantasy Adventure in the Roaring 20s
by Thilo G. [Featured Reviewer] Date Added: 08/15/2017 04:48:47

An Endzeitgeist.com review

This book clocks in at 65 pages, 1 page front cover, 1 page editorial, 1 page ToC, 2 pages of SRD, leaving us with 60 pages of content, so let’s take a look!

This review was sponsored by my patreons and moved up in my review-queue as a prioritized review.

So, first of all: What is this? In short, it is intended as a toolkit to create Pathfinder campaigns that take place in the roaring 20s, blending fantasy and pulp – a strange combo, but one that very well may work rather well. There are some considerations for such a game – unlike more far-out settings, Pulpfinder per default assumes a human-only version of the game; so no, unlike e.g. Hydra Cooperative’s almost system-neutral (and really impressive) Weird Adventures, you won’t have a full-blown blending of classic fantasy tropes with pulp. The other deviation from the base system would be classes. Unnecessarily complicated metrics for equipment: 1 gp = $2. This will sooner or later really be annoying when converting. It’s not hard, but just another step to consider, which is, from a game-design-perspective, simply not required...and provides no benefit.

A significant change, with everyone playing humans, would be that the book presents origins, serving the same purpose – they determine your attribute-modifications etc. The book does not clearly state whether this means that the standard human traits are not applied or not – while the answer is no, I think the book should have noted that in the start of the chapter. A total of 6 such origins are included...and they frankly don’t really constitute origins all the time – a bon vivant, to take the first example, doesn’t really say anything about that aspect...but that may be me. Anyways, the origins presented aren’t necessarily perfect: Take the bon vivant: +2 Cha and Int, -2 Wis, +4 to Diplomacy to influence NPC attitudes, +2 to Diplomacy and Sense Motive ( yep, that’s a total of +7 (+1 for the Cha-increase, +4 untyped bonus, +2 racial bonus) to influence NPC attitudes and +2 to saves to resist poisons, alcohol or drugs. In case you haven’t noticed, this is heavily lopsided and geared towards certain classes.

This extends to most of the others: Hermetic Study guys and gals get +2 Int and Wis, -2 Str, +2 (unytped) to all knowledge skills, 2 languages per rank of Linguistics and +2 to Will saves. Wildman get +2 Con and Wis, -2 Cha, +2 to AC when in a chosen terrain, +2 to Knowledge (nature) and Survival and +2 to initiative. Working Class folks get +2 Str and Con, -2 Int, +2 to all Profession and Craft skills (obviously, working class folks make the best lawyers, doctors, etc.) and +2 to Fort-saves as well as the option to continue fighting for 1 more round after being reduced below 0 hp, but not killed. Career criminals get +2 Dex and Cha, -2 Con, +1 to all saving throws, +2 to Escape Artist and Stealth and +2 to Perception. Finally, cosmopolitans (annoyingly referred to as „world travellers“ by the book, which may mean almost the same, but still irks me...) get the bonus feat, +2 to an attribute of choice and +1 skill per level.

As a whole, it is pretty clear that the origins all are geared towards specific classes and options. They, to me, are not really origins in the sense of the word, but more problematic would be that they, ultimate don’t really provide a nuanced array of options, instead very clearly gearing them to specific pursuits. This is a pity – for, as mentioned in my reviews of Xoth material, I do enjoy the notion of not using races to determine these types of rules. As presented, I am definitely not impressed.

Anyways, the next section depicts the cadre of classes and oddly switches layout style from a two-column-presentation to a 1-column-presentation.The classes generally fill a similar niche as those in the base class roster, though a scaling AC-bonus is baked into every one of the classes. This bonus varies by class, scales…and is only defined for the first class, as working only while unarmored and unencumbered, none of the other classes have a concise definition for this in the respective entry. The fact that the bonus only applies while unarmored and unencumbered is weird, considering the armor-proficiencies gained by characters. It also means that the math isn’t coming together too well at mid and high levels and enhances the importance of Strength – without it, your AC is not going to cut it as soon as you need to carry basically…anything substantial.

The classes, in all brevity, would be: The soldier, who gets full ABB-progression, 2 + Int skills per level, d10 HD, good Fort-saves and basically gains the gunslinger’s deeds plus weapon training a bunch of bonus feats. This would be, btw., as well a place as any to note that firearms act as martial weapons (oddly, armor proficiencies tend to be capitalized in a violation of formatting conventions). Firearms are reloaded as a move action, which botches interaction with the rapid reload feat, which explicitly states how it affects firearms. Oddly, firearms still suffer from misfire. While we’re at the subject – yes, there are rules for scattershots and automatic fire, both of which are very potent, ignoring e.g. concealment in the latter case. Also, strangely, line of effect does not feature in the rules-language, which may be a reason why these are so potent…and which can explain for some of the issues that can crop up here.

But let’s get back to the classes: Aristocrats get d8 HD, 8 + Int skills, ¾ BAB-progression and good Will-saves, being defined by their fortune (which can be gained with a 1 level dip), being defined further by bonus feats and aristocrat talents alternating. The talents btw. pretty exclusively pertain rerolls and social skill tricks as well as abilities that represent the power of status – but sans a status score or interesting mechanic there. Explorers gain d10 HD, 6 + Int skills (!!!), full BAB-progression and good Ref-saves – ability-wise, he basically gains Ranger abilities, that’s it. Scoundrels are rogue reskins, who gain d8 HD, ¾ BAB-progression, good Reflex-saves, 8 + Int skills as well as a ton of talents taken 1:1 from them rogue alongside some of its signature abilities…no sneak attack, though. Priests are basically clerics, with Cha-based channel and Wis-based spellcasting. Mystics are basically wizards. All of the classes have things in common: They are only recombinations of the classic classes; they diverge in power, wildly (aristocrat vs. mystic, explorer vs. soldier); their rules-language and bonus types are pretty concise in their presentation (since they are taken 1:1 from existing material), and they, as a whole, bring pretty much nothing new to the table clogging a ton of pages with information that does not really contribute anything interesting to the game. (At this point, we’re at page 32, fyi.)

A barebones feat for Mad Science (duplicating spell-lists for item creation) and 3 minimalist new skills (forget skill unlocks etc.) can be found. The weapon table of available items only covers one page, and most of the content has been presented before. Fun fact: Flame throwers inflict RAW untyped damage, unless they explode – then they suddenly inflict fire damage. The 4 armor types are pretty inadequate and their presentation ignores several formatting convention. The section contains notes on lifestyle costs, mad science services (i.e. duplicating spell effects) and the like – and it contains detailed vehicle rules, with various different cars – the fact that this presents these cars and vehicles in a concise and easy to grasp manner helps big time here and makes this constitute the first aspect of the pdf that actually has something to offer for me.

In fact, oddly, once the pdf stops duplicating basically copies and recombinations of previously published material, it begins being pretty much…interesting! The spell section has some really creative ideas: Using a spell to make an undead car? Broadcasting your thoughts via radio waves? There are some seriously cool and creative ideas here. I wish this brief chapter and the notes on existing spells were longer.

The pdf also features two alas, uninspired PrCs – the mad scientist at 10 levels and the 5-level private detective, both of which are utterly unremarkable. The pdf also offers a very brief and sketchy “The City” sample setting, which is nowhere near enough the level of detail where it’d make sense and the advice for pulp gaming is decent. I did enjoy the brief list of slang and the further research notes, though.

Conclusion:

Editing and formatting are weird: Due to the amount of content that was just copied and pasted and recombined, it is better than what you’d expect, but nowhere near as precise as it should be, with hiccups cropping up here and there. Layout adheres to a 1-column or 2-column standard – not sure why the pdf alternates there. The best aspect here would be the really cool b/w-artworks throughout the book, which are really, really nice. The pdf does not have any bookmarks, which represents an inexcusable comfort detriment for a rules-book of this size.

Charles Smith’s passion for pulp is evident. However, at the same time, this book doesn’t really succeed at what it sets out to do. From a crunch perspective, this is too brief and all of its classes are boring variants that are pretty much the epitome of bland filler. They would have been bad back in 2010, but nowadays? No dice.

I don’t get why we needed these, considering that, frankly, they are not internally consistently balanced and don’t bring anything new to the table. They are wasted space. The origins are problematic as well. The scarce setting information doesn’t really help that much to endear this book to the reader either.

Unfortunately, this means that there is no reason to get this book. There is literally nothing positive I can say about the book at hand as a whole; a few creative ideas buried in a ton of redundant filler does not make for a compelling book. While the craftsmanship formally isn’t bad, even the by now not too gracefully aged Xcrawl classes make for better options. More than half the pages of this book are useless, boring, bad variants (or straight reskins) and the lack of pages due to them clogging the pdf is evident everywhere. They btw. Lack FCOs. There are no traits or alternate origin traits.

And yes, playtest did show that the material plays just like I figured they would.

In short: I can’t really picture any scenario when this would be worth getting. Anachronistic Adventurers is infinitely better and the base system has a ton more to offer. While the craftsmanship is not bad per se, it’s also not excellent, showing a lack of experience with the more intricate components of design-work. In the end, I can’t really go higher than 2 stars for this pdf – it does not deserve a 1.5 rating for its craftsmanship, but it is pretty much obsolete and doesn’t have much to offer.

Endzeitgeist out.



Rating:
[2 of 5 Stars!]
Pulpfinder: Fantasy Adventure in the Roaring 20s
Click to show product description

Add to DriveThruRPG.com Order

Pulpfinder: Fantasy Adventure in the Roaring 20s
by Sabrina H. [Verified Purchaser] Date Added: 07/17/2015 17:31:41

I bought this book for rules materiel to import into my own projects, rather than as a system to use in its entirety. This colors my perceptions of the product, but I definately do like what I see.

It starts out with character creation, which replaces the standard Pathfinder race system with an origin system, which gives you ability score adjustments and features based on your upbringing and social position. This is a clever idea, even for settings that do include playable races other than human. I'll probably end up using this in a modified form.

Next is some classes for early 20th century games. Each class gets an armor class bonus to compensate for low availability of armor. We get the Soldier, which is basically a Fighter with Gunslinger deeds. This pretty basic (not that the Fighter isn't), but mechanically solid. Next is the Aristocrat, which seems to be a social focused Rogue. It gets a bonus feat every other level, which has a reasonable selection of combat feats, and aristocrat talents every level it doesn't get a feat (the talents focus on social bonuses). This one I think needs additional combat power, as it doesn't seem to get a lot of combat abilities and only has medium BAB. The Explorer is pretty much a Ranger with favored terrain from first level, no favored enemy, and no spells. It likewise doesn't have quite enough combat power in my eyes. The Scoundrel is a more stealth focused Rogue, with no sneak attack except a talent that adds critical damage, some bonus feats, and a scaling stealth ability. The talents provide good stealth and movement, but not quite enough combat utility. The Priest has channel energy for 1d6 healing/damage per 2 levels, domains, and 0-9 level spellcasting. So, basically a Cleric. The Mystic is basically a Wizard, with Arcane Bond, Arcane School, a handful of bonus feats, and 0-9th level spellcasting. The classes are a weak point of the book, as the Explorer, Aristocrat, and Scoundrel seem to have traded combat power for non-combat utility when compared to the Pathfinder classes, which makes them less useful in a fight. With the Soldier being about on par with a Fighter and the Spellcasters barely changed, the fact that three classes are weaker than Pathfinder and three the same presents a problem. It isn't too hard a problem to fix, just a matter of allowing Aristocrat and Scoundrel players to access the Rogue and Ninja talents and increasing the number of uses for per day talents (which should be done in any Pathfinder game, really), and tacking the Skirmisher Ranger archetype onto the Explorer, so I'll only take away half a star for that, but I can't recommend using the classes as-is.

The Feats and Skills chapter only has one feat, Mad Scientist, but it is a good feat. It basically allows non-spellcasters to craft items as if they were spellcasters. The three skills are the Craft, Drive, and Pilot skills needed for vehicles.

The Firearms rules are solid enough, being better than D20 Modern and not relying on Reflex saves, and the generic firearm stats are solid enough. The chapter with gun rules and stats also has basic adventuring equipment and cost of living figures for different lifestyles, and gives a few mad science alternatives to spells like raise dead and restoration.

The next chapter is vehicle rules. They look solid enough, but I've never used vehicle rules before, so I lack a basic for comparison.

Spells adds some new spells that deal with modern technology, and explains how some old spells work with new technology.

Prestige classes include the Mad Scientist, which gets an item creation feat every other level and greatly increased ability to mimick spell lists when creating items. The Private detective gets perception and luck bonuses and a couple of bonus feats.

The next chapter is an example setting, which is a pretty basic Roaring 20s city. Given that this is supposed to be an example, I can understand why it is so basic.

The final chapter is tips for GMing, which explain the basics of the pulp genre in good detail for a basic overview and provides some slang and links to further research.

This document has its fair share of ideas and rules I can borrow, which is what I bought it for, so I'm pretty satisfied. Aside from taking off half a star for the classes, I don't have any complaints, which leaves me at 4 1/2 stars, which rounds out to five.



Rating:
[5 of 5 Stars!]
Displaying 1 to 3 (of 3 reviews) Result Pages:  1 
0 items
 Hottest Titles
 Gift Certificates